Tout sur Thinking Fast and Slow behavioral economics

Tout sur Thinking Fast and Slow behavioral economics

Blog Article

This book had me laughing and smiling, more than many a book described in its blurb as side-splittingly funny pépite something similar because I recognised the cognitive disillusions described in this book as my own and in any compartiment I am the kind of person who if they fall into a good mood wonders if it's due to the pint and the Agace that was eaten earlier.

Another explication frimousse in the field is the University of Chicago economist Richard Thaler. Je of the biases he’s most linked with is the endowment effect, which leads traditions to placette an irrationally high value nous-mêmes our possessions. In an experiment conducted by Thaler, Kahneman, and Jack L. Knetsch, half the participants were given a mug and then asked how much they would sell it for.

I was thinking that perhaps the best way to explain those other books would Supposé que to compare them to Monty Python. I want you to imagine something - say you had spent your entire life and never actually seen année episode of Monty Python's Flying Circus. That wouldn't mean you wouldn't know anything embout Monty Python. It is chimérique to have lived at any time since the late 60s and not have had some socially dysfunctional male réparation the entire Parrot sketch pépite Spanish Inquisition sketch at you at some stage in your life. I suspect, although there is no way to prove this now, obviously, that Osama bin Laden could do the Silly Walk like a natural.

My originaire with this book, which is Je I've tossed aside after 60 pages, is not so much that it's poorly présent or that it's hard to understand - in fact, the exact inverse is true.

We value losses more than gains. (349) Which is fine except when that means we expose others to more risk parce que we did the math wrong.

If the correlation between the pensée of spouses is less than perfect (and if men and women je average do not differ in entendement), then it is a mathematical inevitability that highly intelligent women will be married to husbands who are nous average less pénétrant than they are (and péché versa, of course).

Plaisant we can âcre as hell beat Je another with books like this until we piss Race and can’t hold our toothbrushes due to nasty rotator cuff injuries. That’ll teach règles.

I guess I didn't Averse intuition the details in how the studies were conducted cognition every minor cote in the author's thinking slow and fast daniel kahneman theories--though I largely agreed with the theories and interpretations.

In commencement order of complexity, here are some examples of the automatic activities that are attributed to System 1:

And it's not that the prose is too technical (okay, sometimes it is) fin rather that Kahneman is stuck somewhere between academic technicalities and clear expressive prose.

Vos Papier vus récemment et vos recommandations en vedette › Afficher ou bien troquer votre historique à l’égard de nautique Après disposer consulté rare produit, regardez céans contre revenir simplement sur ces pages lequel vous-même intéressent. Recommencement Dans dominant

Kahneman ha won the Nobel Prize intuition economy so expect a part of technical stuff and experiments in this Nous-mêmes. Exactly how I like my nenni-imagination to Supposé que. I learned so many interesting facts about how our brain functions and it is influenced by different factors.

So why does this stuff matter? In the context of broader discussion of free will, intention, choice and control over the gouvernement our lives take, this book can provide powerful insights that might currently Quand obscured by these "cognitive méprise" and the inherent limitations of "System 1/System 2" thinking.

If you want to take the Reader's Digest pass through the book, then Chapter 1 and Case 3 are probably the most abordable and can Si read in less than an hour, and still leave you with a fair understanding of the author's thesis.